Supreme Court To Hear Hernández v. Mesa

SCOTUS granted cert. 15-118 Hernandez v. Mesa

This case has to do with the US Governments use of deadly force at the Mexican-American border. See below.

15-118 HERNANDEZ V. MESA

DECISION BELOW: 785 F.3d 117

LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 12-50217

QUESTION PRESENTED:

In Boumediene v. Bush, this Court held that the Constitution's extraterritorial application

"turn[s] on objective factors and practical concerns," not a "formal sovereignty-based test."

553 U.S. 723, 764 (2008). That holding is consistent with Justice Kennedy's concurrence two

decades earlier in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), rejecting four

Justices' formalist approach to extraterritorial application of the Fourth Amendment's warrant

requirement.

The questions presented are:

1. Does a formalist or functionalist analysis govern the extraterritorial application of the

Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unjustified deadly force, as applied to a cross-border

shooting of an unarmed Mexican citizen in an enclosed area controlled by the United States?

2. May qualified immunity be granted or denied based on facts-such as the victim's legal

status

IN ADDITION TO THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED BY THE PETITION, THE PARTIES ARE

DIRECTED TO BRIEF AND ARGUE THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: “WHETHER THE CLAIM

IN THIS CASE MAY BE ASSERTED UNDER

BIVENS v. SIX UNKNOWN FED. NARCOTICS

AGENTS, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).”

CERT. GRANTED 10/11/2016

SCOTUS 4th Amendment Case 2016 Mesa

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

Attorney Advertising: This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. This website is owned and operated by Joseph B. CaraccioNY Immigration Lawyers DOT org is not a law firm or business entity and does not engage in the practice of law. The attorneys on this website are not partners in a legal practice or law firm. 

 

Publicidad de Abogados. Este sitio web está diseñado sólo para información general. La información presentada en este sitio no debe interpretarse como asesoramiento legal formal ni la formación de una relación abogado / cliente. 

 

This website is attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

  • w-facebook
  • Twitter Clean
  • LinkedIn - White Circle

NY Immigration Lawyers practicing immigration law in New York, New Jersey, Long Island, Staten Island, Bronx, Westchester, Brooklyn, Queens, Bushwick, Bed-stuy, Park Slope, Brooklyn Heights, Crown Heights, Williamsburg, DUMBO, Red Hook, Downtown, Atlantic Avenue, East New York, Richmond Hill, Kew Gardens, Forest Kills, Jamaica, Rego Park, Queens Village, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Huntington Station, Mineola, Glen Cove, Hempstead,  Glen Head, Bayville, Sea Cliff,  Levitown, East Meadow, Herricks, Albertson, Roslyn, Old Brookville, Locust Valley, Wyndanch, Elmont, Ozone Park, Bayside, Little Neck, Douglaston, Astoria, Flushing, Newark, Kearny, and we will take any Immigration Case anywhere in the United States.